I will focus upon the arguments of Wang Yang Ming's theory of ”Zhi Hsin He Yi”(知行合一) in this paper. Concerning this issue, scholars have proposed various interpretations, pondering whether ”Yi Nian Fa Dong Chu” (一念發動處) is applicable to ”Zhi Hsin He Yi.” For instance, Chen Lai accentuates ”Chong Hsin” (重行) and argues that ”Yi Nian Fa Dong Chu” is not applicable to ”Zhi Hang He Yi.” Besides Li Ming Hui suggests that ”Yi Nian”(意念) is also an ”act” in ”Zhi Hsin He Yi” so as to solve the entanglement. Inspired by these researches, I intend to analyze the intricate relationship between ”Zhi Hang He Yi” and ”Yi Nian.” Furthermore, I will reevaluate whether ”Shan Nian”(善念) and ”Er Nian”(惡念) can be categorized as an ”act” in Wang Yang Ming's theoretical framework. Finally, I attempt to assimilate the arguments proposed by Chen Lai and Li Ming Hui while returning to the core principle of Wang Yang Ming's ”Zhi Hsin He Yi.”
"Zhi Hsin He Yi" (the unity of cognition and practice)
"Yi Nian Fa Dong Chu" (the point when the concept arises)
"Chong Hsin" (emphasizing the practice)
the meaningful "Zhi Hsin"
陳泰西(2017)。
宋明理學中「惡」之來源的探析——以朱子、王陽明、劉蕺山思想為討論重點
〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700266
Airiti Library
Google Scholar