Claims to equality are dualist in nature: those to whom equality are applicable must be affirmed as morally equal, and their social and economic treatments are to be judged in terms of their morally equal status. In a brief survey, the way this dualist character developed in history is given a broad sketch. Then, the implications of moral equality for equality of treatment are brought into the open. The liberal provenance of equality, as well as the transformation of issues of equality into issues of justice, is underlined.

陳閔翔(2014)。 作為平等的正義:德沃金平等自由主義的理路與辯護 政治與社會哲學評論 (51),93-138。https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532014120051003
  • Airiti Library
  • Google Scholar
  • 黃禾田(2011)。 自由、平等、共同體:寇恩對自由主義的批評 〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2011.01270
  • Airiti Library
  • Google Scholar
  • 陳如薰(2010)。 台灣原住民之大學入學加分措施與憲法平等原則之研究-從西方政治理論及美國憲法案例出發 〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.02966
  • Airiti Library
  • Google Scholar
  • 邵允鍾(2007)。 從憲法角度檢視移工不得自由轉換雇主之相關規定:以平等權論述為核心 〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2007.01464
  • Airiti Library
  • Google Scholar
  •