Aims: This study investigated the relationship among love styles, relationship quality and well-being for college students with a long-distance relationship, compare the differences in love styles, relationship quality and well-being between college students with or without a long-distance relationship, and to investigate if their well-being could be predicted by their status of long-distance, love styles and relationship quality.
Methods: Survey method was utilized and subjects were eligible to participate in the study if they were studied in university of Taiwan and were involved or current involving in a romantic relationship. Purposive sampling method were used with college students by completed an online questionnaire and 314 valid responses were collected. For those who are involving in a romantic relationship (N=220), given students that self-report involving with a long-distance relationship as observation group(N=114) while students that self-report involving without a long-distance relationship as controlled group(N=106). The measurement tools included Taiwanese love styles scale (college student version), Relationship Adjustment Scale, Chinese Happiness Inventory (short version), Demographic variables, and the phenomenon of long-distance relationship such as frequency of face-to-face contact with partners, separated physical distance and psychological distance. Data were analyzed using such as descriptive statistics, chi-square, t-tests, Pearson correlation, a two-way ANOVA and hierarchical regression analysis. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital.
Results: 1. Most of the college students with a long-distance relationship could have face-to-face contact with their partner within 30 days (71.1%) and the separated physical distance was within 400 km (77.1%). Long-distance group and non-long-distance group showed no significant difference in gender, grade, nationality, financial status, past romantic relationship experience, current length of dating, and past long-distance relationship experience and length. 2. The love styles of college students with a long-distance relationship were tend to “Romantic and Expression style”. There was no significant difference between long-distance group and non-long-distance group in love styles and relationship quality, well-being of long-distance group were significantly scored lower than non-long-distance group. 3. There was significant correlation between love styles, relationship quality and well-being among college students who involving in a romantic relationship. 4. Whether college students were involving in a romantic relationship or being single, having or never had a long-distance relationship experience, different type of love styles showed no significant difference in well-being. 5. Whether college students were involving in a long-distance relationship or different psychological distance, different types of love styles showed no significant difference in relationship quality. 6. Whether college students were involving in a long-distance relationship or different psychological distance, different types of love styles showed no significant difference in well-being. 7. The subjectively and psychological distance, and relationship quality of college students could predict the score of well-being. 8. “Psychological distance”, “Worrisome and Possessive style”, “Sincere and Devoted style”, and “subjectively long-distance” could predict 21% of the total variation of well-being of the college students.
Discussion and Suggestions: Well-being of college students that involving in a romantic relationship was significantly correlated with perceived psychological distance towards partners more than whether involving in a long-distance relationship. “Sincere and Devoted style” and “Marriage-Purposeful style” love styles of college students have the characteristics of dedication or commitment to each other, and mutual trust and understanding on the future or maintenance of the relationship, which were helpful to the relationship quality. The results offer a deep understanding of college students with a long-distance relationship and suggestions are made as references for next study and practitioners.
謝誌………………………………………………………………………….…….…..I
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………….…….….II
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………….……….III
目錄…………………………………………………………….……….…………….V
表目錄…………………………………………………………………….………..VIII
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………….…………..X
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………….……….1
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………….……….7
第一節 遠距離戀愛之內涵及其相關研究…………………………….…….7
第二節 愛情風格之內涵及其相關研究……………………………………14
第三節 愛情關係品質之內涵及其相關研究………………………..……..17
第四節 幸福感之內涵及其相關研究……………………………….……...21
第五節 遠距戀愛大學生之背景因素……………………………….……...27
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………….……...29
第一節 研究架構與研究問題……………………………………….……...29
第二節 研究對象……………….…………………………………….……. 30
第三節 研究工具………………….…………………………….…………..31
第四節 研究程序…………………………………………………….….…..38
第五節 資料分析…………………………………………………….….…...40
第六節 研究倫理…………………………………………………….….…...41
第四章 研究結果……….…………………………………………………….……...43
第一節 遠距組與非遠距組之人口學變項特性現況…………………….…43
第二節 遠距組與非遠距組愛情風格之分佈與差異比較……………….…49
第三節 遠距組與非遠距組在關係品質及幸福感之得分情形與差異比較.51
第四節 戀愛中大學生愛情風格、關係品質與幸福感之相關........53
第五節 大學生樣本有無伴侶、是否有過遠距經驗及不同愛情風格在幸福感之差異……………………………………………56
第六節 遠距戀愛及愛情風格與關係品質之關係…………………….........57
第七節 遠距戀愛及愛情風格與幸福感之關係…………….........................61
第八節 遠距戀愛及關係品質與幸福感之關係 ……………………………64
第九節 戀愛中大學生樣本遠距狀態、愛情風格與關係品質對幸福感之預測……………………………………65
第五章 討論…………………………………………..……………….…….……….67
第一節 戀愛中大學生遠距離之現況……………………….……….……...67
第二節 遠距與非遠距戀愛大學生愛情風格、關係品質與幸福感之差異.71
第三節 戀愛中大學生愛情風格、關係品質與幸福感之關係……...….…72
第四節 戀愛中大學生遠距狀態、愛情風格與關係品質對幸福感之預測…………………………………………………74
第五節 戀愛中大學生不同心理距離及不同愛情風格在關係品質與幸福感之差異…………………………………………………76
第六節 大學生幸福感之有無伴侶差異………………………………….…77
第六章 結論與建議…………………………………..……………….…….……….79
第一節 結論………………………………………………….……….……...79
第二節 建議………………………………….…………………….…….…..80
第三節 研究限制……………………………………………………….……81
參考文獻………………………….………………………………………………….84
中文部分……………………………………………………………..…...….84
英文部分……………………………………………………………………..88
附錄………………………….………………………………………….…………....97
附錄一 研究問卷………………………………………..…………………...97
附錄二 愛情風格量表使用同意書…………………………………..…….107
附錄三 關係適應量表使用同意書…………………………………..…….108
附錄四 幸福感量表使用同意書……………………………………..…….109
附錄五 臨床試驗計劃許可書………………………………………..…… 110
王慶福（1995）。大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究（未發表之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
王慶福（2000）。當男孩愛上女孩：人際依附風格之類型搭配、愛情關係與關係適應之研究。中華輔導學報，8，177-201。
王慶福、張德榮、林幸台（1995）。愛情關係及其影響因素的分析研究。中華輔導學報，3，92-126。
江采瑩（2016）。交友配對測驗及關係滿意度預測模式之探討（未發表之碩士論文）。世新大學，台北。
李明純（2007）。一起再啟之意義追尋：越洋遠距戀情的生活經驗（未發表之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義。
李宥萱（2006）。通勤家庭未通勤婦女的生活目標、依附風格與幸福感關係之研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，台北。
沈怡廷（2013）。伴侶條件差距、愛情關係品質與主觀幸福感之關聯性研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹。
卓紋君（2004）。臺灣人愛情風格之分析研究。中華輔導學報，16，71-117。
卓紋君、顏欣怡（2013）。台灣人愛情風格量表再修訂－以大學生族群為本。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，25，65-87。doi:10.6308/JCPRC.25.02
林永貞（2012）。戀愛中大學生愛情風格、性態度與親密關係滿意度之相關研究－以南部地區為例（未發表之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄。
林季誼（2017）。台南市大學生依附關係、人格特質與愛情風格之相關研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南。
林桂妘（2016）。遠距戀愛伴侶親密感受之變化與因應（未發表之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南。
林暐云（2018）。遠距離戀愛進行式：成人依附風格,愛情維持行為與關係滿意度之相關研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立清華大學，新竹。
施佩瑄（2018）。大學生情緒界限、愛情風格與愛情關係適應之相關研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南。
洪貫瑄（2020）。大學生網路交友之自我揭露、愛情風格與愛情關係滿意度相關研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立台南大學，台南。
徐驊君（2018）。大學生依附關係、愛情風格與問題因應之相關研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南。
浦憶娟（2010）。高中職教師人際關係與幸福感關係之研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，台北。
高瑞盈（2016）。關係維繫行為對遠距離愛情關係品質的影響性-以親密關係發展階段為調節變項（未發表之碩士論文）。國防大學，桃園。
國際兩岸教育司（2020, June 2）。2009-2019各年度我國學生赴主要留學國家留學簽證人數統計表【統計資料】。擷取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2500/News_Content.aspx?n=2D25F01E87D6EE17&sms=4061A6357922F45A&s=A46653AE07C18A2B
張允瑄（2015）。多遠都要在一起：遠距離情侶調適經驗敘說研究（未發表之碩士論文）。世新大學，台北。
張采君（2014）。愛情關係適應、自我證實與婚前承諾之關係研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國防大學，台北。
莊柏瑄（2019）。「我這裡下雨了，你那邊呢？」– 跨國遠距離戀愛者之榮格取向釋夢工作（未發表之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
許舒婷 、陳志賢（2016）。中途學校少女性態度、自我價值感與愛情風格之相關研究。人文社會科學研究，10，2，32-51。
陳乃綺（2012）。臺北地區未婚男女愛情風格與婚姻態度之相關研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立臺東大學，台東。
陳怡臻（2013）。遠距離戀愛者之故事敘說：愛情承諾的望見與預想（未發表之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南。
陳家維、孫頌賢（2014）。遇見遠距離愛情中的男性： 在助人工作上的啟發。國民教育，54(6), 71-81。
陳菡瑜（2020）。成年未婚者愛情關係不確定性對關係滿意度影響之研究-關係維持行為之中介效果（未發表之碩士論文）。銘傳大學，桃園。
陳詩潔、吳麗娟（2008）。大學生的共依附特質、自我感受與愛情關係品質之相關研究。教育心理學報，40（1），153-178。
陸洛 （1998）。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，8，1，115-137。
陸洛、高旭繁、陳芬憶 （2006）。 傳統性、現代性孝道觀念及其對幸福感的影響：一項親子對偶設計，本土心理學研究，25，197-232。
曾琪芳（2011）。親愛的，你怎麼不在我身邊：跨國遠距離情侶的關係維繫（未發表之碩士論文）。國立台北教育大學，台北。
黃尹貞（2009）。遠距離戀愛者愛情關係的詮釋現象學探究（未發表之碩士論文）。中國文化大學，台北。
黃世傳（2016）。台灣男同志愛情風格與關係承諾度及關係滿意度之探討（未發表之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄。
廖子緣（2018）。婚前承諾、犧牲意願與愛情關係適應之相關研究（未發表之碩士論文）。台北市立大學，台北。
鄧郁馨、王嵩音（2015）。見面還是不見面？情侶維繫關係之管道分析。新聞學研究，122，121-167。
鄭名汝（2021）。成人依附型態、情緒調節與遠距離戀愛關係之相關研究（未發表之碩士論文）。屏東大學，屏東。
黎佩欣、朱玲慧、余民寧（2017）。獨樂樂不如眾樂樂：人際關係是影響樂觀解釋風格與幸福感間關係的中介角色。中華輔導與諮商學報，49期，53-78。
謝享霈（2018）。Y世代生活型態、愛情態度與科技準備度對網路交友認知與行為之影響（未發表之碩士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮。
謝明均（2015）。大學生寂寞感、社會支持與幸福感之關係研究（未發表之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。
顏志龍、鄭中平（2017）。給論文寫作者的統計指南：傻瓜也會跑統計（修訂版）。台北：五南。
顏欣怡、卓紋君（2013）。大學生情侶之愛情風格、溝通姿態、關係滿意度及關係承諾度之探討—對偶分析研究。中華心理衛生學刊，26（3），443-485。
Adamczyk, K. (2016). Voluntary and involuntary singlehood and Young Adults’ Mental Health: An Investigation of mediating role of romantic loneliness. Current Psychology, 36(4), 888–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9478-3
Adamczyk, K. (2017). Development and validation of a Polish-language version of the satisfaction with relationship status scale (Resta). Current Psychology, 38(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9585-9
Adamczyk, K., & Segrin, C. (2014). Perceived social support and mental health among single vs. partnered polish young adults. Current Psychology, 34(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9242-5
Argyle, M., Martin, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). 幸福心理學（施建彬、陸洛譯）。台北：巨流圖書公司。
Beckmeyer, J. J., & Cromwell, S. (2018). Romantic relationship status and emerging adult well-being: Accounting for Romantic Relationship Interest. Emerging Adulthood, 7(4), 304–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818772653
Borelli, J. L., Rasmussen, H. F., Burkhart, M. L., & Sbarra, D. A. (2014). Relational savoring in long-distance romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(8), 1083–1108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514558960
Breeana, S. (2005). Perceptions of College Students in Long Distance Relationships. Journal of Undergraduate Research, 8, 1-5.
Butler, A. C., & Goodfriend, W. (2015). Long distance vs proximal romantic relationships: Predicting commitment, investments, and Bias. Modern Psychological Studies, 20(2), 31-40.
Cameron, J. J., & Ross, M. (2007). In times of uncertainty: Predicting the survival of long-distance relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(6), 581–606.
Campbell, S. M. (2016). The concept of well-being. In Fletcher, G. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being (pp. 402-418). London: Routledge.
Cassepp-Borges, V. (2020). Should I stay or should I go? relationship satisfaction, Love, love styles and religion compatibility predicting the fate of relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 25(3), 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09798-2
Chickering, A.W. (1969). Education and Identity. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Cionea, I. A., Wilson Mumpower, S. V., & Bassick, M. A. (2018). Serial argument goals, tactics, and outcomes in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 84(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794x.2018.1531915
Clemente, M., Gandoy‐Crego, M., Bugallo‐Carrera, C., Reig‐Botella, A., & Gomez‐Cantorna, C. (2020). Types of love as a function of satisfaction and age. PsyCh Journal, 9(3), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.338
Crystal Jiang, L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Absence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12029
Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2001). A relational uncertainty analysis of jealousy, trust, and maintenance in long‐distance versus geographically close relationships. Communication Quarterly, 49(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370109385624
Dargie, E., Blair, K. L., Goldfinger, C., & Pukall, C. F. (2014). Go long! predictors of positive relationship outcomes in long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2013.864367
Davis, K. E., & Latty-Mann, H. (1987). Love styles and relationship quality: A contribution to validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 409-428.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81-84. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415
Diener, E., Pressman, S. D., Hunter, J., & Delgadillo-Chase, D. (2017). If, Why, and When Subjective Well-Being Influences Health, and Future Needed Research. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 9(2), 133–167. doi:10.1111/aphw.12090
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. Assessing Well-Being, 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_10
Du Bois, S. N., Sher, T. G., Grotkowski, K., Aizenman, T., Slesinger, N., & Cohen, M. (2015). Going the distance. The Family Journal, 24(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480715616580
Farrell, J.M. (2009). Notions of distance: Communication constraints in long-distance dating relationships (Master’s thesis). University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038
Firmin, M., Firmin, R., & Lorenzen, K. (2014). A qualitative analysis of loneliness dynamics involved with college long-distance relationships. College Student Journal, 48, 57-71.
Galinha, I. C., Oishi, S., Pereira, C. R., Wirtz, D., Esteves, F. (2014). Adult attachment, love styles, relationship experiences and subjective well-being: Cross-cultural and gender comparison between Americans, Portuguese, and Mozambicans. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 823–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0512-7
Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., Faingataa, S., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). Happily single. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615599828
Glenn, N. D. (1990). Quantitative research on marital quality in the 1980s: A critical review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4), 818. https://doi.org/10.2307/353304
Goldsmith, K. M., & Byers, E. S. (2018). Perceived and reported romantic and sexual outcomes in long-distance and geographically close relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2018-0016
Gómez-López, M., Viejo, C., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2019). Well-being and romantic relationships: A systematic review in adolescence and emerging adulthood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132415
Guldner, G. T., & Swensen, C. H. (1995). Time Spent Together and Relationship Quality: Long-Distance Relationships as a Test Case. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(2), 313–320. doi:10.1177/0265407595122010
Hammonds, J. R., Ribarsky, E., & Soares, G. (2020). Attached and apart: Attachment styles and self-disclosure in long-distance romantic relationships. Journal of Relationships Research, 11. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2020.10
Hampton, A. J., Rawlings, J., Treger, S., & Sprecher, S. (2018). Channels of computer-mediated communication and satisfaction in long-distance relationships. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 11(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v11i2.273
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 784–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.784
Jiang, L., Drolet, A., & Kim, H. S. (2018). Age and social support seeking: Understanding the role of perceived social costs to others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 1104–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218760798
Joel, S., Eastwick, P. W., Allison, C. J., Arriaga, X. B., Baker, Z. G., Bar-Kalifa, E., & Wolf, S. (2020). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 19061–19071. doi:10.1073/pnas.1917036117
Kanemasa, Y., Taniguchi, J., Daibo, I., & Ishimori, M. (2004). Love styles and romantic love experiences in Japan. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 32(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.3.265
Kansky, J. (2018). What's love got to do with it? Romantic relationships and well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers.
Kelmer, G., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S., & Markman, H. J. (2012). Relationship Quality, Commitment, and Stability in Long-Distance Relationships. Family Process, 52(2), 257–270. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01418.x
Kim, J., & Hatfield, E. (2004). Love types and subjective well-being: A cross-cultural study. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 32(2), 173-182.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.2.173
Knox, D., Zusman, M., Daniels, V., & Brantley, A. (2002). Absence Makes the Heart Grow Fonder?: Long Distance Dating Relationships among College Students. College student journal, 36, 364-367.
Lee, J. A. (1973). Colours of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. New Press.
Lee, J., & Pistole, M. C. (2012). Predictors of satisfaction in geographically close and long-distance relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(2), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027563
Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture and conceptions of happiness: individual oriented and social oriented swb. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 5(3), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-8789-5
Lu, L., & Lin, Y. Y. (1998). Family roles and happiness in adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 195–207. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00009-9
Lu, L., 2008, "The Chinese conception and experiences of subjective well-being", Discovery of Applied Psychology, 1, 19-30. (Supported by NSC93-2752-H-030-001-PAE and NSC94-2752-H-008-002-PAE).
Maguire, K. C. (2007). “Will it ever end?”: A (Re)examination of uncertainty in college student long-distance dating relationships. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701658002
Maguire, K. C., & Kinney, T. A. (2010). When Distance is Problematic: Communication, Coping, and Relational Satisfaction in Female College Students’ Long-Distance Dating Relationships. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(1), 27–46. doi:10.1080/00909880903483573
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.56
Neto, F. (2012). Compassionate love for a romantic partner, love styles and subjective well-being. Interpersonal: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 6(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v6i1.88
Neto, F., & Wilks, D. C. (2017). Compassionate love for a romantic partner across the adult life span. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i4.1204
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Collins, N. L. (2017). Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000129
Pistole, M. C., & Roberts, A. (2006). Measuring an alternate life style: The long-distance romantic relationship. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e527542007-001
Pistole, M. C., Roberts, A., & Chapman, M. L. (2010). Attachment, relationship maintenance, and stress in long distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(4), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510363427
Pistole, M. C., Roberts, A., & Mosko, J. E. (2010). Commitment predictors: Long-distance versus geographically close relationships. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(2), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00003.x
Raffagnino, R., & Puddu, L. (2018). Love styles in couple relationships: A literature review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 06(12), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.612027
Rhodes, A. R. (2002). Long-distance relationships in dual-career commuter couples: A review of counseling issues. The Family Journal, 10(4), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/106648002236758
Roberts, A., & Pistole, M. C. (2009). Long-Distance and Proximal Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: Attachment and Closeness Predictors. Journal of College Counseling, 12(1), 5–17. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2009.tb00036.x
Rohmann, E., Führer, A., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (2016). Relationship satisfaction across European cultures. Cross-Cultural Research, 50(2), 178–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116630950
Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029841
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the Science and practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
Seligman, M. E. P. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653
Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Karwowski, M., Groyecka. A., Aavik, T., Akello, G., & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Universality of the Triangular Theory of Love: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Triangular Love Scale in 25 Countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1787318
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28. Doi: 10.2307/350547
Stafford, L. (2010). Geographic distance and communication during courtship. Communication Research, 37(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209356390
Stafford, L., & Merolla, A. J. (2007). Idealization, reunions, and stability in long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(1), 37–54. doi: 10.1177/0265407507072578
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.119
Suwinyattichaiporn, T., Fontana, J., Shaknitz, L., & Linder, K. (2017). Maintaining Long Distance Romantic Relationships: The College Students Perspective. Kentucky Journal of Communication, 36(1), 67–89.
Sweet.Ring. ( 2019, April 4) 。台男最不能接受！這個原因成戀愛殺手（部落格文章）。拮取自https://blog.sweetring.com/article/long-distance/
Sydow, L. (2018, February 14). Spend in Top Dating Apps Nearly Doubled Last Year [Web blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.appannie.com/en/insights/market-data/2017-spend-in-dating-apps/
Taneja, S., & Goyal, P. (2020). Impact of physical proximity in romantic relationships on trust, commitment and relationship satisfaction among young adults. Indian Journal of Mental Health, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.30877/ijmh.7.1.2020.15-20
Toma, C. L., & Choi, M. (2016). Mobile Media Matters. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2835204
Turcotte, M. (2013, March n.d.). Living apart together [Article]. Retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/site/fra/9.576003/publication.html
Vedes, A., Hilpert, P., Nussbeck, F.W., Randall, A.K., Bodenmann, & Lind, W.R. (2016). Love styles, coping, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12112
Veenhoven, R. (2020, December 22). World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands Assessed at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl
Waterman, E. A., Wesche, R., Leavitt, C. E., Jones, D. E., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2017). Long-distance dating relationships, Relationship Dissolution, and college adjustment. Emerging Adulthood, 5(4), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817704118
Whitton, S. W., Weitbrecht, E. M., Kuryluk, A. D., & Bruner, M. R. (2013). Committed dating relationships and mental health among college students. Journal of American College Health, 61(3), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2013.773903