Communication and Media, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
摘要
在本文中，我们探讨了反女权主义和顺性别主义媒体逻辑是如何交织在一起的，尤其是在体育媒体的背景下。我们通过重点分析 2018-2019 年主要在英国媒体上报道的最近案例来研究这些问题。围绕玛蒂娜·纳芙拉蒂洛娃 (Martina Navratilova) 介入有关跨性别纳入女性体育类别的辩论的媒体事件的连续展开，将根据案例研究中的关键标记进行探讨：@Martina 干预；自我审查和失去控制；按地位合法化；历史合法化；在媒体中给予女性特权和纪律处分。作为一位著名的女权主义者和女同性恋活动家，在这个话题上提出了顺性别主义的论点，纳芙拉蒂洛娃案例研究的事件表明女权主义者的声音是如何复杂地分裂的。而且，
ABSTRACT
In this article we explore how anti-feminist and cisgenderist media logics are intertwined, particularly in the context of sports media. We examine these issues through focused analysis of a recent case reported in 2018–2019 predominantly in the British media. The sequential unfolding of media events surrounding Martina Navratilova’s intervention into the debate about trans inclusion in the female sporting category is explored with regard to key markers in the case study: @Martina intervenes; Self-censorship and loss of control; Legitimisation by status; Legitimisation by history; and Privileging and disciplining women in the media. As a prominent feminist and lesbian activist who asserted cisgenderist arguments on this topic, the events of the Navratilova case study show how feminist voices are complexly fragmented. Moreover, we demonstrate too how feminist perspectives are controlled by a media system that uses them in the substantiation of cisgenderist projects of discrediting trans athletes and actors.
