Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 960S on one side and the HiSilicon Kirin 960 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the tablet sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,4GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page
.
Specification comparison:
|
Processor
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 960S
|
|
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 960
|
|
|
|
Market (main)
|
|
Tablet
|
|
|
|
Smartphone
|
|
|
|
ISA
|
|
ARMv8-A (64-bit)
|
|
|
|
ARMv8-A (64-bit)
|
|
|
|
Microarchitecture
|
|
Cortex-A73, Cortex-A53, big.LITTLE
|
|
|
|
Cortex-A73, Cortex-A53, big.LITTLE
|
|
|
|
Family
|
|
Kirin 900
|
|
|
|
Kirin 900
|
|
|
|
Part number(s), S-Spec
|
|
Kirin 960S
|
|
|
|
Kirin 960, Hi3660
|
|
|
|
Release date
|
|
2016 Q4
|
|
|
|
2016 Q4
|
|
|
|
Lithography
|
|
16 nm FFC
|
|
|
|
16 nm FFC
|
|
|
|
Transistors
|
|
4 000 000 000
|
|
|
|
4 000 000 000
|
|
|
|
Cores
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Threads
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Base frequency
|
|
1,84 GHz
|
|
|
|
1,84 GHz
|
|
|
|
Turbo frequency
|
|
2,4 GHz
|
|
|
|
2,36 GHz
|
|
|
|
Energy cores
|
|
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1,84 GHz
|
|
|
|
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1,84 GHz
|
|
|
|
High performance cores
|
|
4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2,4 GHz
|
|
|
|
4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2,36 GHz
|
|
|
|
Cache memory
|
|
4 MB
|
|
|
|
4 MB
|
|
|
|
Max memory capacity
|
|
6 GB
|
|
|
|
6 GB
|
|
|
|
Memory types
|
|
LPDDR4-1800
|
|
|
|
LPDDR4-1800
|
|
|
|
Max # of memory channels
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Max memory bandwidth
|
|
28,8 GB/s
|
|
|
|
28,8 GB/s
|
|
|
|
TDP
|
|
5 W
|
|
|
|
5 W
|
|
|
|
GPU integrated graphics
|
|
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
|
|
|
|
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
|
|
|
|
GPU execution units
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
GPU shading units
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
GPU clock
|
|
900 MHz
|
|
|
|
1037 MHz
|
|
|
|
GPU FP32 floating point
|
|
265,5 GFLOPS
|
|
|
|
282 GFLOPS
|
|
|
|
Socket
|
|
SoC
|
|
|
|
SoC
|
|
|
|
AnTuTu
|
|
166 768
|
|
|
|
170 500
|
|
|
(Android)
PassMark CPU Mark
|
|
2 726
|
|
|
|
2 384
|
|
|
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
|
|
1 578
|
|
|
|
1 846
|
|
|
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
|
|
5 737
|
|
|
|
6 174
|
|
|
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
|
|
1 457
|
|
|
|
1 294
|
|
|
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance
|
|
37,2 GFLOPS
|
|
|
|
38 GFLOPS
|
|
|
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio
|
|
1 147 pts / W
|
|
|
|
1 235 pts / W
|
|
|
|
Amazon
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 960S is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
The difference is 2%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 14%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
In a single core, there is no noticeable difference. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
HiSilicon Kirin 960S Intel equivalent
HiSilicon Kirin 960S AMD equivalent
HiSilicon Kirin 960 Intel equivalent
HiSilicon Kirin 960 AMD equivalent
Smartphones with the processor HiSilicon Kirin 960:
Honor 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9 Pro
Huawei Nova 2s
Huawei P10
Huawei P10 Plus
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Trading System Forex
W3Ask
W3Ask Brasil
W3Ask Deutschland
W3Ask España
W3Ask France
W3Ask Italia
W3Ask Nederland