Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Learn more about Collectives

Teams

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Learn more about Teams

I am loading an <iframe> in my HTML page and trying to access the elements within it using JavaScript, but when I try to execute my code, I get the following error:

SecurityError: Blocked a frame with origin "http://www.example.com" from accessing a cross-origin frame.

How can I access the elements in the frame?

I am using this code for testing, but in vain:

$(document).ready(function() {
    var iframeWindow = document.getElementById("my-iframe-id").contentWindow;
    iframeWindow.addEventListener("load", function() {
        var doc = iframe.contentDocument || iframe.contentWindow.document;
        var target = doc.getElementById("my-target-id");
        target.innerHTML = "Found it!";
                I actually used window.postMessage() and still get the error the OP mentioned when trying to access event.source in the target window.
– Leslie Krause
                Dec 12, 2022 at 15:34

Same-origin policy

You can't access an <iframe> with different origin using JavaScript, it would be a huge security flaw if you could do it. For the same-origin policy browsers block scripts trying to access a frame with a different origin.

Origin is considered different if at least one of the following parts of the address isn't maintained:

protocol://hostname:port/...

Protocol, hostname and port must be the same of your domain if you want to access a frame.

NOTE: Internet Explorer is known to not strictly follow this rule, see here for details.

Examples

Here's what would happen trying to access the following URLs from http://www.example.com/home/index.html

URL                                             RESULT
http://www.example.com/home/other.html       -> Success
http://www.example.com/dir/inner/another.php -> Success
http://www.example.com:80                    -> Success (default port for HTTP)
http://www.example.com:2251                  -> Failure: different port
http://data.example.com/dir/other.html       -> Failure: different hostname
https://www.example.com/home/index.html:80   -> Failure: different protocol
ftp://www.example.com:21                     -> Failure: different protocol & port
https://google.com/search?q=james+bond       -> Failure: different protocol, port & hostname

Workaround

Even though same-origin policy blocks scripts from accessing the content of sites with a different origin, if you own both the pages, you can work around this problem using window.postMessage and its relative message event to send messages between the two pages, like this:

  • In your main page:

    const frame = document.getElementById('your-frame-id');
    frame.contentWindow.postMessage(/*any variable or object here*/, 'https://your-second-site.example');
    

    The second argument to postMessage() can be '*' to indicate no preference about the origin of the destination. A target origin should always be provided when possible, to avoid disclosing the data you send to any other site.

  • In your <iframe> (contained in the main page):

    window.addEventListener('message', event => {
        // IMPORTANT: check the origin of the data!
        if (event.origin === 'https://your-first-site.example') {
            // The data was sent from your site.
            // Data sent with postMessage is stored in event.data:
            console.log(event.data);
        } else {
            // The data was NOT sent from your site!
            // Be careful! Do not use it. This else branch is
            // here just for clarity, you usually shouldn't need it.
            return;
    

    This method can be applied in both directions, creating a listener in the main page too, and receiving responses from the frame. The same logic can also be implemented in pop-ups and basically any new window generated by the main page (e.g. using window.open()) as well, without any difference.

    Disabling same-origin policy in your browser

    There already are some good answers about this topic (I just found them googling), so, for the browsers where this is possible, I'll link the relative answer. However, please remember that disabling the same-origin policy will only affect your browser. Also, running a browser with same-origin security settings disabled grants any website access to cross-origin resources, so it's very unsafe and should NEVER be done if you do not know exactly what you are doing (e.g. development purposes).

  • Google Chrome
  • Mozilla Firefox
  • Safari
  • Opera: same as Chrome
  • Microsoft Edge: same as Chrome
  • Brave: same as Chrome
  • Microsoft Edge (old non-Chromium version): not possible
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer
  • Any other answer I've found 1, 2, suggests that CORS/Access-Control-Allow-Origin does not apply to iFrames, only to XHRs, Fonts, WebGL and canvas.drawImage. I believe postMessage is the only option. – snappieT Jan 14, 2015 at 12:12 @SabaAhang just check for the iframe.src, and if the site it's different from your domain's hostname then you can't access that frame. – Marco Bonelli Oct 17, 2015 at 9:34 For simple cases another workaround would be to pass GET parameters as part of the src and extract them on the recieving side through location object, ex <iframe src='foobar.com/?sCSS=color%3Ared'></iframe> – Daniel Sokolowski May 20, 2016 at 16:59 @user2568374 location.ancestorOrigins[0] is the location of the parent frame. If your frame is running inside another site and you check using event.origin.indexOf(location.ancestorOrigins[0]) you are checking if the origin of the event contains the parent's frame address, which is always going to be true, therefore you are allowing any parent with any origin to access your frame, and this is obviously not something you want to do. Moreover, document.referrer is bad practice too, as I already explained in the comments above. – Marco Bonelli May 22, 2018 at 13:39 @jub0bs thanks for pointing that out. Unbelievable that such a piece of code has been sitting there for such a long time. Updated! – Marco Bonelli Aug 25, 2022 at 18:46 window.postMessage we can use only if we can able to access both parent(our HTML page) and children element(other domain iframe).Otherwise "THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY", it will always throws an error "Uncaught DOMException: Blocked a frame with origin "<yourdomainname.com>" from accessing a cross-origin frame." – VIJAY P Feb 1, 2017 at 18:35 Except this doesn't seem to work correctly for local files. If I do window.opener.postMessage( { }, "*" ); in a popup window, then the parent window will not be able to access event.source. I get "Blocked a frame with origin "null" from accessing a cross-origin frame." This is ironic, since the documentation specifically states that the entire point of postMessage is to allow secure communication across different origins. – Leslie Krause Dec 12, 2022 at 15:41

    Check the domain's web server for http://www.example.com configuration for X-Frame-Options It is a security feature designed to prevent clickJacking attacks,

    How Does clickJacking work?

  • The evil page looks exactly like the victim page.
  • Then it tricked users to enter their username and password.
  • Technically the evil has an iframe with the source to the victim page.

    <iframe src='victim-domain.example'/> <input id="username" type="text" style="display: none;"/> <input id="password" type="text" style="display: none;"/> <script> //some JS code that click jacking the user username and input from inside the iframe... <script/>

    How the security feature work

    If you want to prevent web server request to be rendered within an iframe add the x-frame-options

    X-Frame-Options DENY

    The options are:

  • SAMEORIGIN: allow only to my own domain render my HTML inside an iframe.
  • DENY: do not allow my HTML to be rendered inside any iframe
  • ALLOW-FROM https://example.com/: allow specific domain to render my HTML inside an iframe
  • This is IIS config example:

       <httpProtocol>
           <customHeaders>
               <add name="X-Frame-Options" value="SAMEORIGIN" />
           </customHeaders>
       </httpProtocol>
    

    The solution to the question

    If the web server activated the security feature it may cause a client-side SecurityError as it should.

    I don't think that X-Frame-Options applies here - X-Frame-Options defined by the guest (embedded) page can cause the parent to refuse to load the page, but as far as I know it doesn't affect javascript access - even with X-Frame-Options: *, I don't think you'll be able to access the DOM of a different origin guest page with javascript – Noah Gilmore Nov 5, 2019 at 14:54 This answer didn't actually answered the question, the question didn't ask if this was safe or not. – rafark Nov 23, 2021 at 4:13

    For me i wanted to implement a 2-way handshake, meaning:
    - the parent window will load faster then the iframe
    - the iframe should talk to the parent window as soon as its ready
    - the parent is ready to receive the iframe message and replay

    this code is used to set white label in the iframe using [CSS custom property]
    code:
    iframe

    $(function() {
        window.onload = function() {
            // create listener
            function receiveMessage(e) {
                document.documentElement.style.setProperty('--header_bg', e.data.wl.header_bg);
                document.documentElement.style.setProperty('--header_text', e.data.wl.header_text);
                document.documentElement.style.setProperty('--button_bg', e.data.wl.button_bg);
                //alert(e.data.data.header_bg);
            window.addEventListener('message', receiveMessage);
            // call parent
            parent.postMessage("GetWhiteLabel","*");
    

    parent

    $(function() {
        // create listener
        var eventMethod = window.addEventListener ? "addEventListener" : "attachEvent";
        var eventer = window[eventMethod];
        var messageEvent = eventMethod == "attachEvent" ? "onmessage" : "message";
        eventer(messageEvent, function (e) {
            // replay to child (iframe) 
            document.getElementById('wrapper-iframe').contentWindow.postMessage(
                    event_id: 'white_label_message',
                    wl: {
                        header_bg: $('#Header').css('background-color'),
                        header_text: $('#Header .HoverMenu a').css('color'),
                        button_bg: $('#Header .HoverMenu a').css('background-color')
        }, false);
    

    naturally you can limit the origins and the text, this is easy-to-work-with code
    i found this examlpe to be helpful:
    [Cross-Domain Messaging With postMessage]

    i'm dealing with an issue with safari where document in iframe is executing its JS later than parent page which causes the message to be sent earlier than document in iframe is listening to messages; which is exactly opposite from what chrome and firefox do - have you tested your code in safari on ios? btw postMessage with second parameter of value "*" is not quite safe, you should always specify domain – sKopheK Mar 22, 2018 at 15:51 Your first block of code, is that on the iframe in the parent or is it on the page that gets loaded into the iframe ? – Demonic218 Feb 15, 2019 at 9:45

    There is a workaround, actually, for specific scenarios.

    If you have two processes running on the same domain but different ports, the two Windows can interact without limitations. (i.e. localhost:3000 & localhost:2000). To make this work, each window needs to change their domain to the shared origin:

    document.domain = 'localhost'
    

    This also works in the scenario that you are working with different subdomains on the same second-level domain, i.e. you are on john.site.example trying to access peter.site.example or just site.example

    document.domain = 'site.example'
    

    By explicitily setting document.domain; the browser will ignore the hostname difference and the Windows can be treated as coming from the 'same-origin'. Now, in a parent window, you can reach into the iframe: frame.contentWindow.document.body.classList.add('happyDev')

    Chrome will disable modifying document.domain from version 106. See developer.chrome.com/blog/immutable-document-domain – user706420 Apr 13, 2022 at 15:22

    I would like to add Java Spring specific configuration that can effect on this.

    In Web site or Gateway application there is a contentSecurityPolicy setting

    in Spring you can find implementation of WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter sub class

    contentSecurityPolicy("
    script-src 'self' [URLDomain]/scripts ; 
    style-src 'self' [URLDomain]/styles;
    frame-src 'self' [URLDomain]/frameUrl...
    
    .referrerPolicy(ReferrerPolicyHeaderWriter.ReferrerPolicy.STRICT_ORIGIN_WHEN_CROSS_ORIGIN)
    

    Browser will be blocked if you have not define safe external contenet here.

    If you have control over the content of the iframe - that is, if it is merely loaded in a cross-origin setup such as on Amazon Mechanical Turk - you can circumvent this problem with the <body onload='my_func(my_arg)'> attribute for the inner html.

    For example, for the inner html, use the this html parameter (yes - this is defined and it refers to the parent window of the inner body element):

    <body onload='changeForm(this)'>

    In the inner html :

        function changeForm(window) {
            console.log('inner window loaded: do whatever you want with the inner html');
            window.document.getElementById('mturk_form').style.display = 'none';
        </script>
    

    I experienced this error when trying to embed an iframe and then opening the site with Brave. The error went away when I changed to "Shields Down" for the site in question. Obviously, this is not a full solution, since anyone else visiting the site with Brave will run into the same issue. To actually resolve it I would need to do one of the other things listed on this page. But at least I now know where the problem lies.

    Terrible for anything that is not a quick and dirty test … and already address in the accepted answer. – Quentin Mar 26, 2019 at 11:23 Even with the command, it doesn´t work because Chrome avoids disabling the web security this way – Metafaniel Jul 3, 2019 at 15:56
  •