This thesis tries to estimate the two wage equation of students of private and public universities after one year graduation and test whether exists any significant difference between the income of public and private graduates.The data used are from the survey of university graduates of Taiwan Integrated Postsecondary Education Database which is the same Database as Tang(2010).In Taiwan,the score of the standarized test is essentially the most important factor determining the student's entering public or private universities;and about 22% of the graduates in this sample do not have a job,therefore,there exists the problem of selectivity bias.To correct these two problems of selectivity bias,in the theoretical part of this thesis,aside from an extension of the popular Heckman two-stage method,a maximum likelihood model which simultaneously estimates the two Probit equations,which determines the student having or not having a job and entering public or private universities,and the two wage equations public and private graduates is developed.However,due to some technical problem,only the extension of the Heckman two-stage method is used in the empirical study.The empirical results indicate the estimated wage is higher for public graduates than that of private ones no matter a public or private representative graduate is used as a basis for comparison and this result is consistent with Tang(2010).Moreover,a Z test,which is applicable to larger samples,also shows that there does not exist a significant difference between them.The results of this thesis might be more reliable than that of Tang(2010) because this thesis uses more data-the data of those not having a job-in order to take into account the other problem of selectivity bias problem(working or not working) besides the selectivity problem of entering public or private universities.
第一章、緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機
第二節 研究目的
第二章、文獻回顧
第一節 相關文獻之核心觀點
第二節 相關理論
第三章、實證理論模型
第一節 最大概似法
第二節 Heckman 兩階段估計方法
第三節 針對兩階段估計方法的修正方式
第四章、資料分析
第一節 資料來源,選取與變數定義
第二節 樣本資料敘述統計
第五章、實證結果
第一節 Probit Model與兩階段估計方法之估計結果
第二節 檢定公私立大學之效率
第六章、結論與建議
附錄
參考文獻
一 中文部分:
王柏鈞(2009),影響個人超額教育因素之探討:考慮選擇性偏誤的模型,東
吳大學經濟系碩士論文.
王妤珣(2010),人格特質與工作動機對績效之影響,國立中央大學人力資
源管理研究所碩士論文.
余若蓉和朱敬一(1998),台大(惠我良多)?-論各大學畢業生初出校門的表
現,經濟論文叢刊,26(1),65-68.
成嘉玲(1991),公私立大學畢業生所得與就業之比較研究-兼論政府對公
私立大學投資的效率,台北:行政院青年輔導委員會.
吳惠林(1988),專上人力勞動報酬的決定因素-台灣的實證分析,16(3),
357-369.
吳家聲和游孟龍(1994),教育投資與工資差異之分析,勞資關係論叢,2,
27-51.
余純奇(2009),高等教育評鑑指標與大學畢業生結構性失業之相關研究-
以國內公共行政相關學系為例,國立台灣大學行政管理學系碩士論
文.
林佳暖(2005),個人特質對於員工從事輔導工作意願之影響, 國立中央大學人力資
源管理研究所碩士論文.
林侑政(2009),全職與非全職過度教育薪資報酬率的差異,東吳大學經濟
系碩士論文.
唐錦屏(2010),比較台灣公私立大學之相對效率,東吳大學精細學系碩士
論文.
陳彧夏(1999),比較台灣公私立大學的相對效率-以在台就業者為例,東吳
經濟商學學報,26,27-53.
陳俊豪(2007),高等教育素質對於畢業生薪資報酬之影響:比較一般大學
與技職院校之實證研究,高雄大學經濟管理研究所碩士論文.
陳桓佐(2006),台灣地區過量教育測量模式之研究,國立台東教育系所碩
士論文.
曾柏瑕(2005)高等教育素質對畢業生薪資影響之實證研究,清華大學經濟
所碩士論文.
曾國寧(2004),知識經濟發展前後的台灣勞動力低度運用現象及其因應對
策探討-以1991年與2003年為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所
碩士在職專班碩士論文.
莊禮函(2005),由過度教育看學歷與工作經驗的抵換關係,國立東華大學
國際經濟研究所碩士論文.
詹凱玲(2004),台灣地區超額教育與薪資報酬,國立東華大學國際經濟研
究所碩士論文.

二 英文部分:
Bedi,Arjun S. and Ashish Garg(2000),"The effectiveness of private
versus public school: the case of Indonesia." Journal of
Development Economics, 61,463-494.
Bjorklund, A. and C. Kjellstrom(2002),"Estimating the Return to
Investment in Education: How Useful is the Standard Mincer
Education," Economics of Education Review,32,195-210.
Buchel, Felix; Pollmann-Schult, Matthias(2004)," Overeducation and
human capital endowments," International Journal of Manpower.
Coleman, J.S. et al.(1966),"Equality of Educational Opportunity,"
Washington: Government Printing Office.
Coleman, J., T. Hoffer, and S. Kilgore(1982),"High School
Achievement: Public, Catholic, and Private Schools Compare,"
New York: Basic.
Coleman, J., and Thomas Hoffer(1987),"Public and Private High
Schools: The Impact of Communities," New York: Basic.
Cox, D. and E. Jimenez(1991), "The relative effectiveness of
private and public schools: evidence from two developing
countries," Journal of Development Economics,34,99-121.
Evans, William N., and Robert M. Schwab(1995),"Fishing High School
and Starting College: Do Catholic Schools Makes a Difference?"
Quarterly Journal of Economics,110(4),941-974.
Evans, William N., and Robert M. Schwab(1996),"Who Benefits from
a Catholic School Education?," Mimeo, University of Maryland,
July.
Figlio, David n. and Joe A. Stone(1997),"School Choice and Student
Performance: Are Private Schools Really Better?" Working paper,
University of Washington.
Figlio, David N. and Joe A. Stone(1999)," Are private schools better
?" Research in Labor Economics,18,115-140.
Goldberger, Arthur S., and Glen G. Cain(1982)," The Causal Analysis
of Cognitive Outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore Report
," Sociology of Education,55, 103-122.
Goldhaber, Dan D.(1996)," Public and Private High Schools: Is School
Choice an Answer to the Productivity Problem?" Economics of
Education Review,15(2),93-109.
Jimenez, Emmanuel, Marlaine Lockheed, and Nougnuch Wattanawah
(1988)," The Relative Efficiency of Private and Public Schools:
The Case of Thailand," World Bank Economic Review,2(2),139-164.
Neal, Derek.(1997)," The Effect of Catholic Secondary Schooling on
Educational Attainment," Journal of Labor Economics,15(1),
98-123.
Noell, J.(1982)," Public and Catholic Schools: A Reanalysis of
Public and Private Schools," Sociology of Education,55,
123-132.
Sander, William.(1996)," Catholic Grade Schools and Academic
Achievement," Journal of Human Resource,31(3),540-548.
Sander, William.(1997)," More on Unobservable and the Catholic
School Effect on Academic Achievement," Working Paper, Depaul
University.
Sander, William, and Anthony C. Krautmann(1995)," Catholic Schools
Dropout Rates, and Educational Attainment," Economic Inquiry,
33(2),217-233.